<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Digest. 06.17.08.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/17/the-digest-061708/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/17/the-digest-061708/</link>
	<description>Where High Gets Low.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:59:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: C-Monster</title>
		<link>http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/17/the-digest-061708/#comment-12978</link>
		<dc:creator>C-Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/17/the-digest-061708/#comment-12978</guid>
		<description>LOL!

i guess i&#039;m defending the indefensible on this one. i just figured that anyone who was willing to talk trash about an authoritarian regime should be allowed to do so, no matter how bogus their motivations. (look ma, i&#039;m on tv!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!</p>
<p>i guess i&#8217;m defending the indefensible on this one. i just figured that anyone who was willing to talk trash about an authoritarian regime should be allowed to do so, no matter how bogus their motivations. (look ma, i&#8217;m on tv!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott mclellan, former press secretary</title>
		<link>http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/17/the-digest-061708/#comment-12881</link>
		<dc:creator>scott mclellan, former press secretary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/17/the-digest-061708/#comment-12881</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t see the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t see the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasonlujan</title>
		<link>http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/17/the-digest-061708/#comment-12837</link>
		<dc:creator>jasonlujan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/17/the-digest-061708/#comment-12837</guid>
		<description>re Ai Wei Wei

I&#039;m calling this as hypocrisy. He spent years in a Chinese labor camp, etc. so he had plenty of history and reason to refuse taking the gov&#039;t&#039;s commission money for his role in the stadium. But he didn&#039;t. 

Bad analogy/cliche: People who buy stolen (luxury) goods, knowing they&#039;re stolen, and then call the seller a thief don&#039;t have room for indignity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re Ai Wei Wei</p>
<p>I&#8217;m calling this as hypocrisy. He spent years in a Chinese labor camp, etc. so he had plenty of history and reason to refuse taking the gov&#8217;t&#8217;s commission money for his role in the stadium. But he didn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Bad analogy/cliche: People who buy stolen (luxury) goods, knowing they&#8217;re stolen, and then call the seller a thief don&#8217;t have room for indignity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C-Monster</title>
		<link>http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/17/the-digest-061708/#comment-12836</link>
		<dc:creator>C-Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/17/the-digest-061708/#comment-12836</guid>
		<description>on the point of accepting the commission, agreed, he coulda turned it down from the get-go. but my question is: does receiving a commission necessarily require compliance in matters of opinion?

besides, he accepted the commission in &#039;03 and has distanced himself only recently. surely he&#039;s allowed to change his mind?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on the point of accepting the commission, agreed, he coulda turned it down from the get-go. but my question is: does receiving a commission necessarily require compliance in matters of opinion?</p>
<p>besides, he accepted the commission in &#8216;03 and has distanced himself only recently. surely he&#8217;s allowed to change his mind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangemenace</title>
		<link>http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/17/the-digest-061708/#comment-12821</link>
		<dc:creator>orangemenace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/17/the-digest-061708/#comment-12821</guid>
		<description>The bird&#039;s nest video + comment isn&#039;t a question of free speech - that man is complaining about a situation that he has contributed to by participating in the construction process and designing something complicated that was sure to put unprotected workers at risk.

Boycotting the Olympics is a BS way of protesting China&#039;s human rights violations when you had the opportunity to TURN DOWN A PROJECT THERE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bird&#8217;s nest video + comment isn&#8217;t a question of free speech &#8211; that man is complaining about a situation that he has contributed to by participating in the construction process and designing something complicated that was sure to put unprotected workers at risk.</p>
<p>Boycotting the Olympics is a BS way of protesting China&#8217;s human rights violations when you had the opportunity to TURN DOWN A PROJECT THERE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
