<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Digest. 06.24.08.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/24/the-digest-062408/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/24/the-digest-062408/</link>
	<description>Where High Gets Low.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:25:43 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tomorrow Museum &#187; Archive &#187; Urban Safaris: Graffiti Sites Considered for Heritage Protection</title>
		<link>http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/24/the-digest-062408/#comment-14362</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomorrow Museum &#187; Archive &#187; Urban Safaris: Graffiti Sites Considered for Heritage Protection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/24/the-digest-062408/#comment-14362</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, it may not be a &#8220;pedestrian paradise,&#8221; but Melbourne is in the middle of a debate that could lead to some curious developments in urban landscapes around the world. Australia&#8217;s National Trust and Heritage Victoria is considering graffiti for heritage protection (via.) Scott Hilditch, chief executive of Graffiti Hurts Australia, says that protecting graffiti would effectively condone acts of vandalism and cost the Australian government over $260 million (U.S. $250 million) a year to clean up. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, it may not be a &#8220;pedestrian paradise,&#8221; but Melbourne is in the middle of a debate that could lead to some curious developments in urban landscapes around the world. Australia&#8217;s National Trust and Heritage Victoria is considering graffiti for heritage protection (via.) Scott Hilditch, chief executive of Graffiti Hurts Australia, says that protecting graffiti would effectively condone acts of vandalism and cost the Australian government over $260 million (U.S. $250 million) a year to clean up. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasonlujan</title>
		<link>http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/24/the-digest-062408/#comment-14358</link>
		<dc:creator>jasonlujan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c-monster.net/blog1/2008/06/24/the-digest-062408/#comment-14358</guid>
		<description>re Lost Amazonian tribe

Almost across the board Indigenous communities viewed this story with suspicion, especially once &quot;experts&quot; began to weigh in and speak for this particular group, as if Representation was needed. Mostly it was Indian-fetishists who feel they are entitled to be able to represent a people they are not a part of. This was especially  prevalent in the blogosphere, where jumping-the-gun is endemic, before proper research can be gathered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re Lost Amazonian tribe</p>
<p>Almost across the board Indigenous communities viewed this story with suspicion, especially once &#8220;experts&#8221; began to weigh in and speak for this particular group, as if Representation was needed. Mostly it was Indian-fetishists who feel they are entitled to be able to represent a people they are not a part of. This was especially  prevalent in the blogosphere, where jumping-the-gun is endemic, before proper research can be gathered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
