<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shepard Fairey in the New Yorker.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://c-monster.net/blog1/2009/02/16/fairey-new-yorker-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://c-monster.net/blog1/2009/02/16/fairey-new-yorker-2/</link>
	<description>Where High Gets Low.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hargo</title>
		<link>http://c-monster.net/blog1/2009/02/16/fairey-new-yorker-2/comment-page-1/#comment-143553</link>
		<dc:creator>Hargo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c-monster.net/blog1/?p=2573#comment-143553</guid>
		<description>The big name critics can&#039;t seem to be able to figure out this show. The TIMES reviewed it this week, and I understand from a highly credible source the author admitted to not having even heard about Shepard before the Obama poster. Doesn&#039;t that along discredit everything about what he has to say about the show? I suspect Schjeldahl, who is a GREAT writer, is equally qualified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big name critics can&#8217;t seem to be able to figure out this show. The TIMES reviewed it this week, and I understand from a highly credible source the author admitted to not having even heard about Shepard before the Obama poster. Doesn&#8217;t that along discredit everything about what he has to say about the show? I suspect Schjeldahl, who is a GREAT writer, is equally qualified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ries</title>
		<link>http://c-monster.net/blog1/2009/02/16/fairey-new-yorker-2/comment-page-1/#comment-132022</link>
		<dc:creator>Ries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c-monster.net/blog1/?p=2573#comment-132022</guid>
		<description>The best thing about this article is the term, applied to Fairey, &quot;budding rascal&quot;.

I have two sons, and they are both budding rascals, I just never knew it before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best thing about this article is the term, applied to Fairey, &#8220;budding rascal&#8221;.</p>
<p>I have two sons, and they are both budding rascals, I just never knew it before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hi-Life 2/15/09 &#171; To Fear It Is To Know It</title>
		<link>http://c-monster.net/blog1/2009/02/16/fairey-new-yorker-2/comment-page-1/#comment-130477</link>
		<dc:creator>Hi-Life 2/15/09 &#171; To Fear It Is To Know It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c-monster.net/blog1/?p=2573#comment-130477</guid>
		<description>[...] Peter Schjeldahl visits Shep Fairey&#8217;s ICA show for the New Yorker and wonders if he &#8220;meant to ridicule rebellion&#8221;. (via C-monster) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Peter Schjeldahl visits Shep Fairey&#8217;s ICA show for the New Yorker and wonders if he &#8220;meant to ridicule rebellion&#8221;. (via C-monster) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

